A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2015, at around 00:10, the Defendant recognized criminal facts by rhythizing the facts charged to the extent that it does not pose a substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right of defense. On November 20, 2015, the Defendant attempted to avoid witnessing the Defendant’s friendly Fluort E in the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station D District Rabbbbing, and during that process, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the police statement protocol to G;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (from June to January 1, 200) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution shall be determined as the Disposition, taking into account the following various circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to a confession and reflect on the instant crime; (b) the exercise of tangible power is relatively minor; (c) the Defendant has no criminal records or criminal records in excess of the fine; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, and other circumstances revealed in the records.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.