1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Presumed factual basis

A. Each land listed in the separate sheet is unregistered land, and D is indicated as the owner on February 20, 1913, on the land cadastre for the cemetery B (hereinafter “land before subdivision”) of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, (hereinafter “Seoul-si”) before the subdivision of the original parcel number, and on the land cadastre for the cemetery No. 915 square meters (hereinafter “the land before subdivision”). The address is not indicated.

[However, it is stated that the address of the owner was changed to E on May 20, 1937 (Fire 12 years).

The land before subdivision was divided into the F Cemetery 658 and G Cemetery 257 on March 31, 1937, and the list on March 10, 194 from the said F land.

2. On December 10, 1958 list of the land indicated; and

3. Each subdivision of the entered land (which became the current land after conversion of land category and conversion of the area). [The ground for recognition] The fact that no dispute exists, Gap evidence 10, Eul evidence 1 through 3 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff, upon receiving the circumstances of D, who is the Plaintiff’s father’s capital increase. On June 9, 1926, D died on June 9, 1926, and H, his/her father, succeeded to the network D’s property solely, and H died on July 29, 1974, and the Plaintiff and I, who is his/her child, jointly inherited the property. The Plaintiff asserts that 1/2 shares out of each of the instant real estate are owned by the Plaintiff.

B. It is not enough to recognize that the entries and videos of evidence Nos. 1 through 9, 11, 12, 13, and 15 are the same as D as those recorded in the land cadastre before division, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is dismissed for lack of grounds.