logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.29 2014노3914
강제추행등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the defendant merely admonished the victim E (the 16 years of age, female) who was exposed with severe exposure, but did not commit an indecent act because the above victim's tumm or tum.

(M) In addition, the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

(F) Determination; 2. Determination

A. The Defendant also asserted the same purport in the lower court, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty by integrating the evidence duly adopted and examined, and rejected the Defendant’s allegation on the grounds of detailed reasons.

Examining the above fact-finding and judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and it cannot be said that there is an error of law affecting the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts, and the above assertion by

B. As to the assertion on unfair sentencing, there is no criminal record on the part of the defendant except for the punishment of a fine for a small amount in 1993, the defendant did not have any criminal record, resulting in contingent crimes under the influence of alcohol, and the degree of indecent act itself seems to be minor, and the defendant did not reflect the defendant's rejection of the crime of indecent act by compulsion, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case, which the defendant committed an indecent act by the victim E's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

3. Conclusion, the defendant.

arrow