beta
Text
1. 41,696,388 won and its importance to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) (Counterclaim Plaintiff)
(a) As regards KRW 10,029,720, June 2019
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a non-financial holding company, the main business purpose of which is financial management and business management support for subsidiaries, and C (hereinafter the corporation is omitted in the trade name indication of each corporation) is a company whose main business is over-speak organic development, D is an online game development business entity, and E and F are companies whose main business is online game item business (hereinafter the above companies collectively referred to as “instant companies”). The instant companies are in a relationship with each other’s subsidiaries or affiliated companies, and G is a company that plays the role of holding companies of the instant companies.
B. On April 2016, 2016, the Defendant joined C’s strategic office as a non-registered director, and on June 2016, he/she held office as a representative director of E and F, the Plaintiff’s subsidiary, and on September 2017, he/she held office as D’s representative director. On January 2018, the Plaintiff was appointed as the Plaintiff’s inside director. On February 2018, 2018, the Defendant retired from C and retired from the Plaintiff’s office as the representative director of the Plaintiff’s office, and then resigned on May 25, 2018.
B. The Defendant’s receipt of benefits after the resignation of the Plaintiff’s representative director and the Defendant’s use of the corporate card, from June 2018 to April 2019, received total of KRW 174,96,677 (including income tax collected from sources) from the Plaintiff by means of account transfer. The Defendant used three copies of the corporate card in the Plaintiff’s name (including the card number H, our card I, and our card J) until May 2019, and the amount used was totaled of KRW 16,493,370.
(c)
As a result of the criminal case, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant for occupational breach of trust, embezzlement, and violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Business with the same content as the cause of the instant complaint as that of the instant complaint under suspicion by the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office No. 2019 type 75215, but the Prosecutor was free from suspicion on all the facts of the complaint against the Defendant on March 30, 2020.