1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 160,00,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 20% per annum from May 9, 2015 to September 30, 2015; and (b) the Plaintiff.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that: (a) the Plaintiff loaned a sum of KRW 170 million to the Defendant from May 19, 2006 to January 30, 2007; and (b) paid KRW 20 million among them; and (c) on January 25, 2008, the Plaintiff additionally lent KRW 160 million to the Defendant, thereby lending KRW 160 million to the Defendant. Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the above loans and delay damages to the Plaintiff.

B. The defendant's assertion that the defendant did not borrow KRW 170 million from the plaintiff, and the evidence No. 1 (cashs) is invalid as a non-remark.

In addition, on January 25, 2008, KRW 10 million was donated to the defendant for the purpose of maintaining internal relations.

2. Determination

A. 10 million won is without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the number of pages), and considering the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of the fact inquiry into the national bank of this court, the defendant prepared cash receipts (Evidence No. 1) stating "I have borrowed daily money)" and delivered them to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's bank account contains KRW 30 million on May 19, 2006, KRW 922.5 million on Sep. 5, 200, KRW 50 million on Feb. 3, 2007, KRW 200,000 on Jan. 307, 2007, KRW 300,000 on the above-mentioned Cash Receipt No. 380,000 on Jan. 30, 207, KRW 300,000 on the above-mentioned Building No. 1630,000 on the above-mentioned fact that the defendant purchased the above fact.