logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.09 2016가단5225493
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) on May 19, 2016, the Plaintiff KRW 40,000, KRW 27,000,000 for each of the said money to Plaintiff A and each of the said money to Plaintiff B and C.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) D is a metropolitan bus No. E 1500 (hereinafter “Defendant bus”) around 13:05 on May 19, 2016.

(i)A driver's 14.7 km point of an expressway 14.7 km in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as "inducing vehicle") is driving at a speed of about 65 km in the speed of about the speed of 65 km from the fourth-lane in the direction of Incheon to the direction of Incheon. It is due to the negligence that is driven by the side of the road while driving on the roadside while driving on the roadside while working on the side of the road.

3) The lower part of the bus was received as Defendant bus, and the leading vehicle was pushed forward due to its shock, and the front part of the Gpoter cleaning vehicle, which was under the road cleaning work, became the rear part of the Gpoter cleaning vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

). 2) 이 사건 사고로 인하여 유도차량의 운전자인 H은 밖으로 튕겨나와 사망하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “H. 3”) Plaintiff A is the deceased’s spouse, and Plaintiff B and C are the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to Defendant bus. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, A. 1-3, 6, 7 evidence, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs, who are the deceased and their bereaved family members, as a mutual aid business operator of the defendant vehicle.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. (1) The instant accident was caused by the gross negligence of the Defendant bus driver, i.e., driving at a roadside, and the deceased was negligent in failing to wear a safety level, and the damage therefrom seems to have been expanded. In addition, the deceased’s age and personal relations with the plaintiffs, etc. (2) The Plaintiff A: 10,000,000 won, respectively, and C: 7,000,000 won, respectively.

B. Inheritance 1: The calculation of plaintiffs 2) is as follows.

H AB(based on recognition).

arrow