1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution against the Plaintiff by the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2009 Ghana2717685 is denied.

2...

The defendant has a claim against the plaintiff for the principal amounting to KRW 9,115,434 based on the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2009Gapo2717685 and damages for delay thereof; the plaintiff filed an application for immunity with the Daejeon District Court 2018Da10023 and the decision on immunity became final and conclusive on May 17, 2018; and the fact that the defendant's claim was omitted in the creditor list at the time the above decision on immunity was granted does not conflict between the parties.

However, taking account of the fact that the delivery of the original copy of the seizure collection order, which the Defendant applied, to the Plaintiff, was eight years prior to the Plaintiff’s exemption, it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff, despite being aware of the existence of the obligation against the Defendant, did not enter it in the list of creditors, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s obligation against

I would like to say.

The plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning.