The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and free evaluation of evidence

In addition, the argument that the court below erred by deviating from or abusing the inherent limits of sentencing discretion based on the principle of balance of crime and the principle of responsibility in sentencing constitutes the argument of unfair sentencing.

However, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, the above assertion is not a legitimate ground for appeal in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.