The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty imposed by the court below on the defendant (three million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s personality and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., and the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant argument and the record, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is deemed adequate, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant provided the instant vehicle that was created a security right as security to a third party for a long time after the Defendant paid only one-time loan to the victim; (b) the Defendant provided the instant vehicle to a third party; and (c) the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime, etc., and all the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.