logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.01.14 2015고정1413
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operated D 702 urban buses, which are owned by advanced transportation companies, as his duties.

On May 27, 2015, at around 14:50, the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Uniform 279-79, the front intersection of the bus center, which is the one-lane, is straightened at a speed narrow speed between the two-lanes in the direction of the independent intersection from the high-speed bank in the direction of the intersection. The accident site is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed. In such cases, the driver of any motor vehicle is negligent in driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the signal or instruction displayed by the signal apparatus or safety sign, while he/she has a duty of care to prevent the accident due to the failure to do so, while changing it to the red signal from the yellow new to the signal signal, which passes the intersection to the intersection, and has violated the right to left-hand turn at the two-lane straight lanes in the same direction of the Roman.

The E (the remaining, the 40-year-old driver) discovered and operated the FF Kaban car, but it did not reach this. The entire part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle conflict with the left side of the E driver’s vehicle, and the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle suffered approximately 2 weeks of injury to E, such as the base of the shoulder and the tension. The Defendant’s driver’s vehicle suffered approximately 10 weeks of injury to G (the 53-year-old passenger) (the 57-year-old passenger), including the pressure 12-day pressure strings, and the victim H (the 57-year-old passenger) suffered approximately 2 weeks of injury, such as alphalin, and the 32-year-old passenger (the nb, the nb, the 25-year-old passenger).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each medical certificate of G, H, I, J, and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black stuffs and video images at the time of the accident;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow