The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment (one million won of fine) declared by the court below is too large.

2. It is recognized that there is no record of criminal punishment after the defendant was punished for a violation of the Automobile Management Act on December 193, 193.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been reduced by a fine (1.5 million won) for a summary order in consideration of the following various circumstances: (a) the Defendant, not a pharmacy owner, has multiple side effects; (b) the Defendant traded fake goods, which are not a refined goods, and thus, (c) has significant harm; and (d) the Defendant appears to have been reduced by a fine for a summary order (1.5 million won) in the lower court in consideration of such various circumstances as above; and (b) the Defendant was not presented in the appellate court in favor of the Defendant; and (c) the sentencing in a similar case, and other various circumstances, which form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and family relationship, the Defendant’s punishment imposed by

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.