logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.02 2017나300037
물품대금
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 190,134,630 and its amount from May 27, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company engaged in the manufacturing and wholesale business of the dudury glass, and the defendant is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and construction business of the dudury glass.

B. Since March 22, 1999, C, the representative director of the Plaintiff, was appointed as the Defendant’s representative director and was in office as the Defendant’s representative director from March 22, 199 to around 2015, the time of each of the following construction contracts, as well as from 2012 to 2015. The Defendant’s representative director was dismissed

C. On September 10, 2012, the Defendant concluded a subcontract with G during the construction period of KRW 253,00,000, and the construction period of KRW 250,000 from September 10, 2012 to April 30, 2013 (hereinafter “I Corporation”); ② On April 1, 2015, JJ determined the construction period of KRW 464,930,00, and the construction period of KRW 205,00, from April 10, 2015 to May 31, 2016 (hereinafter “K Apartment”) and received a subcontract with the said construction period of KRW 205,00,000, KRW 200, KRW 300,000, KRW 205, and KRW 205,000, KRW 200, KRW 208,000, KRW 29,010,000, KRW 29,2019,205.

(hereinafter referred to as "construction works of driving range"). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 3, 5 (including each number), Eul evidence 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) 153,513,630 won and damages for delay are assessed against the plaintiff (representative director C) who did not have a construction license for free construction.

arrow