logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.09.05 2013고정1584
명예훼손등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around June 2010, the defendant's wife had undergone an internal landscape test at the D Hospital operated by the victim C, and there was a fact that anesthesia has been far away from the recovery room in the state where anesthesia has not been broken, and the defendant and the victim have been dissatisfied with the medical treatment problem.

1. Around December 28, 2012, the Defendant insultingd the victim by having the victim C with the fourth floor of the building in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Northernbuk-gu, Seoul, about the foregoing issues as seen earlier, in which the customers look at the D Hospital, and had a dispute with each other, and the victim “influenced the victim”.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out the fact that “The head and the bones of the body were laid down while in the fluence of the fluence.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (i.e., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., that the defendant has committed a crime with a depth of his mistake and in the future, it is obvious that he will not commit such a crime; the motive and circumstances of the case; and the fact that only the defendant has a criminal record of a fine related to

arrow