A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 00:45 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant 200: (b) was under the protection measures for just players within the boundary of the zone in the Masan-dong Police Station D district in the Changwon-si Member C; (c) around 01:40 on the same day, the Defendant she was under the care of just players within the said zone; (d) was under the care of just players; and (e) was under the care of just players; and (e) was under the care of just players; and (e) was under the care of just players; (e) was under the care of justmen in the face of the Defendant; (e) was under the care of justmen; (e) was under the care of justmen; (e) was under the care of justmen; and (e) was under the care of justmen; and (e) was under the care of 1 to the face of 3rdmen.

2. At around 01:40 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant damaged public goods by putting one computer monitors of an amount equivalent to 250,000 won at the market price, which is a public goods on a book that had been located therein, in both hands and was damaged by hiding it on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H, F, G, and E;

1. A written estimate for an investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (Attachment of CCTV images);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Crimes 1 of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution (the scope of recommendations) are invalid and destroyed.