A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, from the Daejeon District Court's branch court.

On August 22, 2019, at around 21:39, the Defendant driven a f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, investigation report (report on the state of drinking drivers), and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, notification of results of the control of drinking driving (one time), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of one copy of a summary order;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration the following circumstances: the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: (a) the high level of blood alcohol content of the instant case; (b) the accused is admitted to commit a crime; and (c) the Defendant was punished by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act; (b) the driving of the instant drinking again was conducted despite the punishment; and (c) the Defendant has