logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2014.12.12 2014고단886
모욕등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:11 on September 26, 2014, the Defendant reported 112 on the same day as the same day in the vicinity of the “B camping site” located in Ansan-si, B, and on September 26, 2014, at around 00:12, the victim, who received the said report, was the victim of the said report, and the background leading up to the case belonging to the D Zone Unit in the Ansan-dong Police Station, the E, the assistant F, who was dispatched to the Defendant, asked the Defendant about the details of the report, etc. on September 26, 2014.

2. The Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) assaulted the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, by arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender; (b) by arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender; (c) refusing to board the vehicle; and (d) taking the E’s right-hand edges, etc. to the patrol vehicle; and (c) assaulting the Defendant, even after having boarded the patrol vehicle, such as taking the left-hand side of the slopeF on the left-hand side of the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, on the 112 patrol car (net 1) who was employed by the Andong Police Station D District Hadong Police Station, and on the 112 patrol car (net 1) H, followed by the Defendant’s 82,50 won by walking the patrol vehicle’s windows and door even in several instances, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of G, I and J

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, as well as Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the commission of obstruction of performance of official duties, inclusive, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act damage to goods for public use.

arrow