A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court, and on July 19, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime at the same court.

On May 16, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.101% among blood transfusion, the Defendant driven B car at a section of about 4km from the roads front of the B-gu Seoul Mine District to the innovation road located in 375, G-gu, Gwangju Northern-ro, G-gu, to the innovation road located in 375.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (verification of the same kind of force);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Order to provide community service, order to attend lectures, and order to attend lectures;

A. Unfavorable conditions: The Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he was punished on three occasions in 2002, 2006, and 2013 due to driving under drinking, which led to the instant crime.

(b) favorable conditions: The defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and there is no record of punishment of suspended execution or more;

C. The Defendant’s punishment was determined in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records of the instant case.