logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.13 2017누52100
분할연금지급취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding a judgment to this court as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff's additional decision in this court is the reason for appeal in this court that "(1) the plaintiff was an old-age patient with heavy time to prepare a written request for reexamination due to stress, etc. caused by the disposition in this case, and does not go against the above time period due to the plaintiff's fault." This is the latter part of Article 108 (2) of the National Pension Act and Article 108 (Request for Examination) (2) of the former part of Article 108 (2) of the Electronic Government Act. (2) The request for examination pursuant to Article 108 (1) of the Electronic Government Act shall be made in writing (including electronic documents pursuant to subparagraph 7 of Article 2 of the Electronic Government Act) within 90 days from the date of the disposition. However, if it is proved that the request for examination could not be made due to a legitimate reason, the request for examination can be made after the expiration of the time period. ② The plaintiff is a person who has joined the National Pension from 198 to December 31, 1998.

1. As to the assertion, it is not substantially different from the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial. The evidence submitted in the first instance trial is examined.

arrow