A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at the C cafeteria located in the C cafeteria located in the Silung-si B on March 21, 2017; (b) requested the Defendant to return home to the Defendant by the Victim F, a police officer affiliated with the 112 notification of D, the proprietor of the said restaurant business; (c) the Defendant: (d) called “the face has taken out.”

C. The embling f.e., f., “f.e., f.,” and assaulted F’s chest by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement of D and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports and investigation reports (the counter-investigation of the shootings of trees);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act / [the scope of punishment] is that there is no basic area (from June to June 1) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] state legal order and order in order to establish a state and eradicate a state’s light of public authority, the crime of interference with the performance of official duties, such as this case, need to be strictly punished.

The degree of violence committed by the defendant to police officers is hot.

In addition, the defendant has a history of suspending the execution of imprisonment with prison labor once and punishing four fines.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant appears to reflect on his/her gender, protection observation and social service shall be ordered to prevent recidivism.