The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, thereby going against the Defendant, committed the instant crime only once, and the damaged goods were returned to the victim, and the Defendant agreed that the Defendant was the victim, and the Defendant was the victim was the victim’s wife, and the Defendant was the victim was the victim at the trial, is a favorable sentencing condition for the Defendant.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment 11 times as a thief crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime for which 4 years have not yet passed since the execution of the sentence was completed due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the thief) and other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable, and thus, the above argument about the above unfair sentencing by the Defendant and his defense counsel is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.