1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the corresponding part among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts in height:

B.2) 5 and 6 degrees in paragraph (b) of 5 and 6(2) [the Plaintiff recognized the fact that the Plaintiff signed the above confirmation on the date for the second instance of this case. The Plaintiff recognized the fact that the completion of the above confirmation was the same as its penology and signed on the confirmation at the court of first instance. However, the Plaintiff did not have the penology of the above confirmation, but agreed to invest KRW 8.5 billion in C around February 20, 2006 and return KRW 13.5 billion with interest of KRW 5 billion after two months, and before the maturity of April 20, 2006, the Plaintiff agreed to prepare the above confirmation prior to the arrival of April 20, 2006. However, the above confirmation is alleged to be forged by the Defendant, and it is against the purport that the confession at the court of first instance as to the authenticity of the instant confirmation is revoked, and it is not contrary to the evidence alleged by the other party that the confession was not duly established on the date for the second instance of pleading, and it is not contrary to the facts established.