1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion at the trial of the first instance do not differ significantly from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion at the trial of the first instance, and it is difficult to view that there exists a proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s work, even if considering the evidence submitted by the parties in the first instance and the fact-finding results of the fact-finding on the head of the Asia University Hospital at the first instance. Therefore, the first instance judgment rejecting the Plaintiff’

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court on this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to adding " August 19, 2015" to "the plaintiff," 7 pages 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and revising "blue couple" to "blue part", and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.