Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 1, 2013, at around 00:40, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in “an empty zone” located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, 725-1, so that the Defendant was faced with the fingers of the wife H of the victim G (the age of 43) and the victim resisted her port; (b) the Defendant her head and her head were boomed with approximately two weeks of the victim’s head; and (c) the Defendant boomed on the left-hand side of the head in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2013. 11. 1. 00:55경 위와 같은 장소에서, 폭력사건 신고를 받고 출동한 서울노원경찰서 I지구대 소속 경사 J이 피고인을 폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한법률 위반죄의 현행범인으로 체포하려고 하자 욕설을 하며 손으로 위 J의 멱살을 잡고, 손바닥으로 J의 뺨을 1회 때리고, 발로 J의 정강이 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to G and J;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the sentencing of the State-managed enterprise and executive officers and employees of the State-managed enterprise should have higher awareness of compliance with the Criminal Procedure Act, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant, who is obligated to assault the victim as a major soldier, inflicted an injury on him; and (b) thereby interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer on official duty in the process of duly arresting him as a flagrant offender; and (c) the act is not

However, there is an agreement with the victim that the defendant is opposed to the confession of the crime of this case.