logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.02 2015고단1592
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a three-dimensional vehicle.

On October 30, 2014, the Defendant driven a high-priced car around 19:25, and led to the left turn to the right of the water level from the Pyeong Middle School at Pyeong-si, which is located in 64 at the regular course of the Pyeong-si, the Defendant had to turn to the right of the water level.

Since there is a crosswalk, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a road to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to drive the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left without neglecting it and received the victim D(77 years of age) and the victim E(73 years of age) in front of the passenger car with the door door middle school.

On October 30, 2014, at around 20:28, the victim D died due to the above occupational negligence of the Defendant, the emergency department of the Seoul National University Hospital at the Seoul National University Hospital. The victim E suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc. in the dynasium which requires approximately four weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (1)

1. Photographs and on-site photographs of the vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning postmortem records;

1. Article 3(1) and proviso of Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selected defense counsel for the selection of fines, the victim E shall claim that the victim E does not constitute “ pedestrians on the crosswalk,” as provided in Article 3(2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, since the victim’s pedestrian signal starts

However, according to the above evidence, when the victim E starts the crosswalk when the pedestrian signal is red, but immediately after that, the pedestrian signal is changed to green, the accident of this case is green.

arrow