beta
Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.
Defendant
B Judgment on Defendant B is not guilty.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In relation to the case of “AL Gameland” as stated in paragraph (5) of the judgment of the court below, Defendant A1’s decision of the court below on the misunderstanding of facts, as to the case of “AL Gameland” as indicated in paragraph (5) of the judgment of the court below, the Defendant was forced to visit AP in the vicinity of AL Gameland, and the Defendant did not have waiting in the vicinity of AL Gameland after receiving a view from a lighting staff as stated in the facts charged. (2) The sentence of the court below’s decision on the Defendant’s unfair sentencing (one year and six months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable. (2) As to the case of Defendant B1’s prior decision of Busan District Office around February 2012 as indicated in paragraph (4) of the judgment of the court below on the misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant did not have received a gathering time from a lighting staff on the day, and there was no fact at the scene. (2) The sentence of the court below’s decision of unfair sentencing against the Defendant is too unfair.
C. The sentence of imprisonment (one year and six months, etc.) imposed by the lower court on Defendant C with respect to the 7th crime as stated in the lower judgment against Defendant C is too unreasonable.
Defendant
E The sentence of the court below (one year of imprisonment) against the defendant is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court’s judgment on Defendant A (A) and the lower court’s determination, it is recognized that the Defendant committed the crime, as described in this part of the facts charged, by waiting at the meeting place as stated in this part of the facts charged and waiting at the scene of the crime.
(1) The relevant N trillion staff, including T leaderW, stated that the Defendant was waiting at the site.
In light of the relationship between this statement and the defendant, it is judged that there is no motive for them to make a false statement against the defendant.
W entered a game room along with AO, AP, Q, and R by the prosecution, and stated that the Defendant, AC, AS, etc., who was in the place of assembly outside of the meeting place, was waiting.
(2) The defendant in the prosecution shall be the assistant staff B Q and AC.