The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (6 months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable condition, such as the Defendant’s confession of all the facts constituting an offense, and the fact that the Defendant returned part of the amount of damage to the victim I and E, while the Defendant again committed the instant offense at the time when one month has not passed since a suspended sentence was sentenced due to a fraudulent act of the same veterinary method, and the Defendant was not recovered properly, and the injury was not agreed with the victims, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the decision of the lower court was rendered, and there are other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s assertion is unreasonable because the lower court’s punishment is too too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.