Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment) by the lower court (e., two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.
(see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). There is no new circumstance to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial. In full view of the following: (a) the reasons for sentencing as stated by the lower court are as follows: (b) the Defendant’s age, records of the crime, the background and method of the crime, the frequency of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime; and (c) the punishment imposed by the lower court is not heavy within the reasonable scope of discretion.
3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the statement of "the relevant Article of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes" as "each Article 5-4(5)1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 330 of the Criminal Act, Article 5-4(5)1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act, Article 5-4(5)1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 331(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 5-4(5)1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 331(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 5-4(5)1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and Article 342 and Article 331(1) of the Criminal Act are corrected."