logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.13 2017노26
재물손괴
Text

The judgment below

Part concerning Defendant B, C, and D among them shall be reversed.

Defendant

B, C, and D shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A’s assertion of misapprehension of the legal principles by the former Office established a unification at the H measure level, which is unlawful as an act infringing the freedom of assembly, and Defendant A’s act was set up against illegal performance of official duties. As such, Defendant A’s act constitutes a legitimate defense or legitimate act, and Defendant A’s act was indicted as a crime of damage to property and the lower court asserted that his act constituted a legitimate defense or legitimate act. As such, Defendant A’s mistake appears to have been written by mistake as a result of confusion with the other Defendants’ assertion. This part of the allegation by Defendant A is to be regarded as a legitimate defense or legitimate act.

B. Defendant B’s misunderstanding of the facts and misapprehension of the legal principles as to Defendant B’s assertion 1) Defendant B merely made a shot speech using a ample ample, ample, or ample, which he had at a place where the public officials of the P Gu office remove a gushed. In collusion with Defendant C and D, Defendant B, in collusion with Defendant C and D, was making a gushed.

There is no fact that the back of the back of the public official of the Gu office is tightly sealed or one hand by the public official of the Gu office.

2) Even if the facts charged in this part of the charges include ampample, ample, etc., which Defendant B possessed, the above ample, ample, etc. is not included in the scope of administrative vicarious execution by the Gu office, and thus, the above ample, ample, etc.’s actions by the public officials of the PP agency

(c)

Defendant

C. D’s misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of the legal principles (the part concerning interference with the performance of official duties) 1) The Gu office had already extracted the gushed in the process of removing the tent of the P office, and was divided into the area around the chemical, and there was no fact that the H measure level increased the gushed to the planned site for the installation of the chemical.

2) The Gu office set up the gushes at the mouth.

arrow