The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of committing the instant crime, the Defendant had a mental and physical loss or mental weakness due to the mental illness caused by the onsite illness.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mental disorder, it is recognized that the defendant suffered from mental illness, such as tidal illness, but in light of the following circumstances, such as the process and process of each of the crimes in this case, the defendant's behavior before and after the crime, etc., the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the instant case

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. It is recognized that there was no criminal history on the previous Defendant’s criminal punishment as to the wrongful argument of sentencing, and that the Defendant received medical treatment due to early illness, etc.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant destroyed a motor vehicle of another person on four occasions; (b) the nature of the crime is not good in light of the frequency of the crime and the scale of damage; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct; (d) the motive and means of the instant crime; and (e) the motive and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.

Provided, That the burden of litigation costs shall be governed by the proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.