The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (one year of suspended execution, one year of probation, one observation of protection, and 80 hours of community service in five months) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). There is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court because new sentencing materials have not been submitted at the trial, and considering the amount obtained by fraud, the criminal history of the Defendant, etc., the lower court’s sentencing was too too large and so, exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.