1. The defendant shall pay 89,10,000 won to the plaintiff and 12% per annum from August 18, 2019 to the day of full payment.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff, on November 30, 2016, either did not dispute or when comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in evidence Nos. 1 and 2, paid the lease deposit amount of KRW 160,000,000,000,000,000 from the Defendant for the rent of KRW 16,000,000,000 for the rent of KRW 28 months, and monthly rent of KRW 200,000,000,000 for the rent of KRW 60,000,000,000,000 for the rent of KRW 10,000 and monthly rent of KRW 100,000,000,000,000 for the rent of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000 for the above rent of KRW 90,000,00,00.

B. According to the above facts, the above lease contract terminated after the expiration of the period, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of the lease deposit amount of KRW 89.1 million (=10 million - KRW 10 million - 900 million) and damages for delay.

2. The defendant's argument concerning the defendant's assertion argues that since the plaintiff's damage was caused to the leased object occupied and used by the plaintiff, the new tenant cannot be sought if the plaintiff does not re-undertake theme, and the plaintiff has become more difficult to find a new tenant due to the registration of the right of lease. Therefore, the defendant's damage should be compensated by the plaintiff.

There is no evidence to prove that the leased object was damaged due to the plaintiff's mistake, and the damage was caused to the defendant due to the plaintiff's right of lease registration.

Even if this is the lessee, it is reasonable for the plaintiff.