[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) is a corporation established for the purpose of electrical construction business, etc. at the YY I, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, and is an electrical construction business operator. Defendant A operates Defendant B together with J and manages all works outside the territory of the Dong-gun, and Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) is a corporation established for the purpose of housing construction business, etc. at Seopo-si K and 101, and Defendant C is a general executive director of Defendant D and the Seoul regional construction is a person who controls the Seoul regional construction.

On July 10, 2017, the Chungcheongbuk-do Education Support Agency (hereinafter referred to as the “Ocheon-do Educational Support Agency”) published a bid for approximately KRW 120 million of the basic construction cost (hereinafter referred to as the “instant bid”) and the said bid was scheduled to determine the successful bidder through the examination of qualifications based on the bid price, construction performance, etc.

[Criminal facts]

1. No electrical construction business operator who violates the Act on Electrical Construction Business shall allow another person to receive or execute electrical construction by allowing another person to use his/her name or trade name or lend his/her registration certificate or registration pocket book to another person;

A. Defendant C: (a) around February 2017, 201, the Defendant was willing to directly construct electrical construction parts by lending the trade name to an electrical construction business operator in order to reduce construction costs while putting together and managing “N new construction works” performed by Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M.

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant offered that he/she lent B’s trade name by telephone to A, and around April 2017, the Defendant received documents related to electrical construction, such as a standard contract contract and a license for electrical construction business, with the content that he/she performed the said electrical construction from A, and directly executed the said electrical construction by using B’s trade name from around that time to July 18, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant executed electrical construction by using another person's trade name.

B. Defendant D’s Defendant C, as indicated in paragraph 1-A., is a user.