1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. A and jointly with A, 6,000,000 won and the same shall be from June 6, 200 to the day of complete payment.

1. The facts of recognition are as shown in the annexed sheet of claim;

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is jointly and severally liable with A to pay to the plaintiff 6,00,000 won of the remaining principal of the loan and 20% interest per annum from June 6, 200 to the date of full payment. The remaining principal of the loan shall be 3,00,000 won, and 53,00,000 won of the remaining principal of the loan and 20% interest per annum from July 27, 2000 to the date of full payment.

As a result, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim of this case is unreasonable since it was liquidated.

According to Article 245 of the Commercial Act, the company continues to exist within the scope of the purpose of liquidation after dissolution, and even if the cause of dissolution has occurred after dissolution, the defendant's dissolution was not immediately extinguished, and thus, even if the defendant completed dissolution registration on November 23, 2002, the defendant still has the legal capacity within the scope of the purpose of liquidation after dissolution. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

(No evidence exists to deem that the liquidation work of the Defendant’s remaining property is completed)

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.