1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(4) The Plaintiff, as evidence in support of the fact that the number of cosmetics used in the above two subjects, which was carried out by G professor, is in conflict with that of G professor, students, or teaching assistants. However, there are parts in which the above persons related to the number and type of cosmetics are in conflict with each other, and most of the statements were made after the lapse of more than one year from 1 semester 1 or 2 semester 2012, and it is difficult for the Plaintiff to secure its accuracy. ⑤ The Plaintiff submitted a confirmation to the effect that professors in charge of other meechers or dries related to the skins at the first instance court, submitted to the effect that it is difficult for the Plaintiff to verify that he was not using the above cosmetics at the 4th instance court, but the above confirmation document was made to the effect that it is difficult for the Intervenor to keep the 10th instance court or 4th instance court, and it is also difficult for the Intervenor to provide it with the 10th class of cosmetics at the school.