logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.25 2015가단18655
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to the Defendant A’s KRW 92,03,162 and KRW 30,000,00 among them:

B. Defendant D, E, F, G, H, I, and J.

Reasons

1. Claim against the defendant A;

(a) Indication of claims: as shown in the annex of claims and the supplementary cause of claims (Provided, That "creditor" shall be deemed "Plaintiff" and "debtor" shall be deemed "Defendant");

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J: (i) there is no dispute between the parties to the claim; (ii) Defendant D, E, F, G, H, I, and J are jointly and severally with the Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the network M; and (iii) Defendant B and C are obligated to pay damages for delay at the rate of 13,145,285,714 out of the money described in paragraph (1) above and 4,285,714 out of them within the scope of property inherited from network M; and (iv) Defendant B and C are obligated to pay damages for delay at the rate of 15,482,687 won each within the scope of property inherited from network N and 5,454,545 won each of them up to 15% per annum from November 28, 2014 to 15 per annum.

3. According to the conclusion, each of the instant claims against the Defendants against the Plaintiff is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow