logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.10.06 2016고정64
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “Dcafeteria” in Incheon City C.

A person who prepares and sells and supplies agricultural and fishery products or products processed therefrom shall not make a false indication of the country of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the country of origin. While the Defendant purchased the said restaurant from November 6, 2015 to March 24, 2016, the Defendant committed an act that may cause confusion as to the country of origin by failing to enter the country of origin on the side of the product column of the said restaurant, with the purchase of the German swine machine of KRW 1,345,573 in an amount of KRW 197 km and prepared and sold and provided it in Ssam Ssam Ssam, while selling and providing it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A statement of detection, a report on investigation (the details of purchase of domestic products and German swine ginseng overlaps), and a report on investigation (the description of the quantity of violation);

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel claimed that the German swine machine was used only in Ssam Ssam, and did not use it for other food, such as spawn. The country of origin labeling is marked only as "domestic spawn," and Spawn on the part of the country of origin labeling, although it did not indicate the items and the country of origin, it was stated as "Spawn, attaching a separate paper A4 paper to the air conditioners immediately adjacent to the country of origin labeling," so there was no indication that it might cause confusion with the country of origin.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, the fact that the defendant committed an act of labeling that could cause confusion as to the country of origin can be sufficiently recognized.

At the time of crackdown, the origin of swine is the domestic origin, and Spanish was written respectively in Spanish, but Spanish was not written in Spanish.

arrow