logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.03.26 2014고단7377
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served as a business director of H, a corporation established for the purpose of real estate sales business, etc., and from November 2009 to February 201, 2010, the Defendant is a person in charge of the duties, such as explaining the current status of the land subject to sale to investors and soliciting purchase, etc., in order to re-sale to investors an amount of 13,304 square meters of I forest land (hereinafter “instant land”) purchased by the said company from November 2009 to February 2, 201.

1. On December 2009, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to purchase part of the instant land from the victim E, D, and G at the above company office located in Busan High-gu J. 1301, Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, that he purchased approximately KRW 142,400 square meters per square meter at the victim E, D, and G, the business employees K of the said company, but the victims are able to purchase the instant land again or compensate for damages by calculating 4.5 percent if the land price is three times within three years,” while indicating the provisional division of the instant land, the Defendant proposed to the effect that “I would register the best land adjacent to the access road of the instant land of this case to register the ownership transfer of the divided land of this case to the victims of the divided land of this case.”

However, the facts did not intend to offer the property owned by the defendant as security in accordance with the above agreement, and there was no intention to re-purchase the land purchased by the victims or compensate for losses after three years, and there was no intention or ability to register the co-ownership of some of the land in this case, and there was no intention or ability to solely transfer the ownership of the land to be purchased by the victims through the process of subdivision.

The defendant deceivings victims in the above manner, and is the victims.

arrow