The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the first gap between the Defendant and the victim C (30 years of age, inn) and smartphone “childphone-friendly delivery.”

The Defendant, around 02:30 on September 22, 2012, entered the Damo 513, Silti City, Silti City, intended to sleep at the bed, and tried to report and rape the victims who drink alcohol in the field of waves.

The Defendant: (a) placed a female victim in a toilet on the bed, kis on the bed; (b) putting his hand on the bed on the bed part of the victim; and (c) embling the victim’s panty in a panty, leaving the panty in the bed part of the victim; and (d) booming the victim’s resistance on two occasions; (b) tried to rape the victim; (c) however, the Defendant did not commit an attempted rape, such as breaking the victim’s shoulder and sound.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Articles 300 and 297 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim's complaint under Article 306 of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the victim can be acknowledged the facts that he declared his intention to revoke the complaint against the defendant on March 26, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.