The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant only aided a victim who is enjoying in a park by force, so that he/she can wear up his/her house; and (b) the Defendant did not assault the victim.

2. The circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the first instance court and the trial court. In other words, the victim of the victim of the victim of the crime stated consistently at the investigative agency and the court of first instance to the effect that he had consistently carried the Defendant’s flab and flabed in a grass-forest, and the defendant made a statement at the investigative agency to the effect that “the victim was flabed and flabed in the flabbing to move to the side by shouldering the victim who was drick,” and that the defendant carried the flab. The defendant moved the victim by cutting the flab on the part of the victim’s chest.

However, in light of the fact that the victim made a statement but there is a red flag flag in the front part of the victim's chest, soil on the right shoulder part of the victim's right shoulder, and there is a flag flag in the victim's knee around the victim's knee, the above flag occurred in the process that the above flag was merely

보기 어렵고 피해자의 진술과 같이 피고인이 피해자의 멱살을 잡아끌고 피해자가 넘어져서 생긴 것으로 보이는 점, ㉣ 피고인 및 변호인은 피해자가 이 사건 당시 인사 불성이었으므로 그 진술을 믿기 어렵다는 취지로 변소하나, 피해자는 이 사건 당시 직접 경찰에 신고하는 등 사물을 변별하고 의사를 결정할 능력이 있는 상태였다고

The statement has credibility in light of the relevant circumstances.

He shows that he had observed the situation at the time and expressed the victim's desire during the process of moving the victim in order to remove the earth and sand and the shoulder bottle, and in the first instance, it is difficult for the defendant to believe that he did not move the victim's timber or flab, and that he did not move the victim's flab, and that he did not go against the defendant's statement that he flab had drawn the victim's flab and flab.