Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2010, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in the Seoul High Court No. 406, the Seocho-gu Seoul High Court, 2009Na45773, as a witness of the lawsuit for ownership transfer registration against the Defendant J, G, H, and I, located in Seocho-gu Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court).

On the other hand, the defendant is the third among five South Koreas between the plaintiff G and the network K of the above case, the first one is the J, the second one is the H, the second one is the above I, and the fifth is L.

On June 23, 1978, the defendant's attachment K and the mother-friendly G purchase from M 160.2 square meters and its ground buildings in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and complete the registration of ownership transfer in the name of K and G.

On October 1985, the above J requested Q, who was attending the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council, to accept the registration of ownership of the above real estate. On October 28, 1985, the above J falsely prepared the above real estate sales contract, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in Q name on October 29, 1985.

Afterward, J completed the registration of ownership transfer in its own name on December 29, 1990.

The Defendant purchased the above real estate by his parents, and had been aware of the fact that Ouni J arbitrarily completed the registration of the transfer of ownership, and had the intention to testify as follows.

1. In the above court, the Defendant asserted in the above court that “The Defendant’s legal representative asked N as a down payment in Japan, entering into a contract with NA as a buyer J, and the remainder of the money was leased at interest rates and made a purchase payment.”

However, the above J did not have prepared the above real estate purchase price.

2. In the above court, the Defendant’s legal representative was accompanied by the witness at the time of the notarial deed by the Plaintiff I and Defendant J. This is clear that the Defendant J was 30 million won to Plaintiff I and her mother was able to repay 10 million won to the Plaintiff I, and N was owned by J, and any family member would no longer own inherited property, and the witness remains with the consent of G, H, I, and L.