logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.11 2012가단277774
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 1,342,811, and KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant A, and KRW 300,000 to Plaintiff C.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 07:56 on June 8, 2012, D, driving a motor vehicle in the Eropoland Ero (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) and incurred injury, such as the Plaintiff’s front and rear malkym of erost in front of the horse in Gyeyang-gu Operation Dong, Incheon Gyeyang-gu, along the two-lane distance from the front to the front and rear erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erord erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost erost.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

B The spouse of the Plaintiff A and the Plaintiff C are the children of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4, Eul's 1 (including branch numbers), and the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination on the main claim

A. 1) According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident of this case as an insurer with respect to the defendant's vehicle (the result of the physical commission and inquiry of the president of the Hanyang University Hospital in this court, and the purport of the court's finding of the fact about F of this court, in full view of the whole purport of the arguments, even though there was a change in the decline of the plane lacing with the plaintiff A before the accident of this case, however, it was proved that the appraisal that pointed out the above change in the lacing nature of the above lacing nature was the most well-known house that directly performed the accident, and after the accident of this case, the plaintiff's lacing lacing surgery against the plaintiff A after the accident of this case.

arrow