logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2020.01.14 2019고단435
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special injury, etc. in the Daegu District Court resident support on October 2, 2018 and completed the enforcement of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on March 6, 2019.

1. On August 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the resident support of the Daegu District Court on the part of August 9, 2016, and was released from a resident prison on May 2, 2017 during the execution of the sentence and passed on May 19, 2017.

On July 5, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.095% of blood alcohol content, driven GW car from approximately 10.5km from the front of the North Myeon Office located in the North Myeon in the North Myeon in the city of Si of Si of Si of Si to the front of the “C” store located in the Gu of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Gu, to the end of the “C” store in the Gu of Si of Si of Si of Si of Gu of Si of Si of Gu of Si of Si of Gu of Si of Si of Gu of Si of Si of Gu of Si of Si of Si of Gu of Si

B. On July 9, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.240% of the blood alcohol concentration, driven the said BMW car from the road front of the “Iju shop” located in the Hah in the Sinyeong-si to the front road of the “Kcafeteria” located in the Sinyeong-siJ.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

2. On September 17, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven the said BMW car and had the front of the MM store located in L while staying at the same time, from the door-to-door room to the seat of the Ham Chang-Eup Office.

At the same time, it is one lane and it was difficult to view at night. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the vehicle in driving service.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in driving the vehicle while driving the vehicle stroke.

arrow