logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.01.18 2017가합51896
보험에 관한 소송
Text

1. It is confirmed that the insurance contract entered in the attached Form 1 insurance contract concluded by the Plaintiff and the Defendant is null and void.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 29, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant with the beneficiary, other than the deceased, as the Defendant indicated in the attached Table 1 insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). The instant insurance contract includes the collateral for the payment of the daily amount of hospitalization when the insured is hospitalized due to illness or injury.

B. From August 25, 2009 to September 14, 2009, the Defendant received hospital treatment for 1,155 days in total due to symptoms, such as waste cancer, knee-free knee-feng, kne-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-gel-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-gre

C. Of the insurance contracts that the Defendant concluded with himself as the insured, the insurance contracts whose coverage content and nature are similar to those of the instant insurance contracts are listed in attached Table 3.

The contract terminated before the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, and cancer insurance contracts, pension insurance contracts, automobile insurance contracts, dental insurance, etc., which cannot be seen as similar to the content and nature of the instant insurance contract, were excluded.

The amount paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant is KRW 52,290,00, and the amount confirmed as insurance amount paid by the insurance companies listed in the attached Table 3, including the Plaintiff, is KRW 884,578,609.

E. The Defendant did not report the amount of income from 2007 to 2016, except for those having reported 180,630 won to the tax authority for business income in 2013, and did not impose property tax, etc. on the Defendant from 2009 to 2017.

[Grounds for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) are written, and this Court's medical hospital, D hospital, Evalescent hospital, F hospital, G hospital, G convalescent hospital, H hospital, I convalescent hospital, Jneary medicine clinic, K convalescent hospital, K convalescent hospital, M hospital, and M hospital.

arrow