2013Do1229 Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Rape, etc.)

2013. Chondo249 (Joint Attachment Orders)

Persons whose attachment order is requested;

A person shall be appointed.

Defendant and the respondent for attachment order

Attorney C, B

Seoul High Court Decision 2013 1469, 2013 Jeonno168 (Joint Judgment) Decided September 27, 2013

December 12, 2013, 26

All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Defendant case;

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have convicted the victim E of some charges on the grounds stated in its reasoning. Contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending

2. As to the case for which a request for attachment order is filed, a final appeal shall be deemed to have been filed as to the case for which the defendant filed a final appeal regarding the case for which the request for attachment order was filed: Provided, That there is no indication of the grounds in the final appeal petition and no statement of the grounds for final appeal

3. Conclusion

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee In-bok

Justices Min Il-young

Justices Park Young-young

Chief Justice Kim Shin -