logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.08.05 2015고정967
업무방해등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2014, the Defendant was unable to proceed with the resident representative meeting by entering the meeting room of the representative meeting of the resident representative of the apartment building in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, without authority to attend the meeting of the victim D, who is the chairperson of the representative meeting of the resident of the apartment building, and making the victim speak "unauthorized chairperson" for about 35 minutes, such as speaking that the victim is "unauthorized chairperson".

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the progress of the victim's representative meeting by force.

2. The Defendant, within the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment management office around 11:00 on October 4, 2014, when the election management members E, etc. of the above apartment occupants are heard, he is the said victim’s “low chron is the chairman.”

(c) It is intended to go beyond the responsibilities of food.

“The victim was openly insulting by means of sound.”

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording of witness D's statements in the third public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Details of processing reported cases;

1. Each public notice, each of which is 1.08.21. Data on the meetings of the representative;

1. Videos (each fact listed in Decision 2);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording of witness D's statements in the third public trial records;

1. A copy of the work log;

1. Additional details;

1. Application of video Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant, etc. under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant's assertion of the defendant, etc. and his defense counsel shall find the crime No. 1 in the judgment at the meeting place to inform the defendant of whether the defendant is the representative of the occupants or not.

arrow