beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by each fine of KRW 5,000,00, and Defendant C and D shall be punished by each fine of KRW 1,000,000.
The Defendants are the defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A or B is a person who has worked as an agent for driving.
On November 2017, Defendant A, B, C, and D’s joint criminal conduct of Defendant A, C, and D’s joint criminal conduct does not interfere with the Defendants’ exercise of their right to defense. On the road, Defendant C and D are on board the 7-vehicle operated by Defendant A while driving the vehicle on the road, and then, Defendant C and D intentionally engaged in a traffic accident by intentionally shocking the back end of the vehicle of Defendant A operated by Defendant B with the F-strost vehicle operated by Defendant B, with intent to receive insurance proceeds from the insurance company under the name of medical expenses and agreement, and then, Defendant A conspiredd to obtain insurance proceeds on November 29, 2017 on the road in the G complex in the G complex in Suwon-gu, the G complex in Suwon-gu, Seoul-gu, 200, with the defect of Defendant A, Defendant C and D boarding the vehicle on the road, and Defendant BF caused the traffic accident by intentionally shocking the vehicle of Defendant B with the vehicle of Defendant B.
Accordingly, Defendant A and C received insurance by phone call from H in which they joined, and Defendant A and C received 1,821,660 won, such as 1,821,60 won in terms of agreement and 331,660 won in terms of treatment expenses, and 1,35,740 won in terms of agreement from H on the same day. Defendant D received 1,75,740 won in terms of 1.3 million won in terms of agreement and 455,740 won in terms of treatment expenses from H on the same day.
As such, the Defendants acquired 6,274,260 won in total, such as medical expenses, agreed money, vehicle repair expenses (875,200 won).
2. On August 28, 2017, Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct, around 22:57, 2017, when driving on behalf of the head of Suwon-si, Suwon-si on the back of the boom-dong, Suwon-si, and was parked with the number-free vehicle, which is the customer vehicle, and was charged with the JI-I-owned vehicle, and was demanded to receive the insurance from the other I-owned vehicles.
However, the defendant was not insured by proxy driving, so it was impossible to receive insurance.