logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2016.10.27 2015가단22006
사해행위취소
Text

1. The part of the conjunctive claim in the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Determination as to the existence of preserved claims for the exercise of obligee's right of revocation and obligee's subrogation right

A. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 4 as to the occurrence of loan claims against Eul and the whole pleadings, the plaintiff was prepared with the notarial deed No. 2, 3, and 4 on December 19, 2003; 250,000,000, amount of loan; 30 October 30, 2003; and 25% per annum; even if compulsory execution is performed at the time of non-performance, 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 20,000,000 won, and 3,000,000,000 won, and 1,000,000,000 won, and 20,000,000 won, 3,000,000 won, and 205,07,0.

According to the above facts, the plaintiff has a loan claim exceeding KRW 122,00,000 on the ground of the notarial deed of this case, unless there are special circumstances as to C.

B. (i) Determination of the Defendant’s assertion of false conspiracy regarding the Defendant’s assertion is made by C around 199.

arrow