logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.08.30 2018고단1505
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around February 2016, the Defendant came to know of the victim E’s E’s son as the subordinate salesperson in D, a multi-level seller of cosmetics, around February 2016.

1. Around June 8, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime at a He Hospital located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the early June 2016, 2016, stating, “Around June 8, 2016, the Defendant loaned KRW 100 million to another person and gave money to a victim and F. It is desirable to grant the other person the money to D formula. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 100 million to B, the Defendant would pay interest at the bar cost to KRW 300,000 per month. The money would be paid with money given in a thickness of two years after the payment.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not pay interest of KRW 3 million per month to another person, and the defendant thought to use the money received from the victim as the so-called "refluence" for the repayment of the debt accumulated by the victim due to the multi-stage business, and did not have any intention or ability to pay the money to the victim.

On June 8, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 100 million from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant, a de facto spouse in a de facto marriage (J) under the pretext of borrowing money.

2. On March 3, 2017, the Defendant stated that “Around March 3, 2017, the Defendant would have repaid the Defendant a loan amounting to KRW 60 million as security to the victim at an influent place.”

However, the defendant did not have to pay a loan of KRW 60 million to the defendant, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money from the victim to the victim.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim and received 25 million won from the victim to the new bank account (J) in the name of the Defendant, a de facto spouse in a de facto marriage on the same day.

"2018 Godan2053" Defendant I. From February 2012, the de facto spouse is a de facto spouse.

arrow