The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized tools (on hand).

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant's punishment (one year of imprisonment and confiscation) of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the above punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

2. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing by the defendant and prosecutor ex officio, the reasons for return to the victim should be sentenced by judgment (Article 33(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act). According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, two half of the same list (number 10 per annum), one half of the same list (number 11 per annum), one half of the half of the same list (number 12), one half of the same list (number 13 per annum), one half of the same list (number 14 per annum), one half of the same list (BF), one half of the same list (number 14), one half of the same list (number 14 per annum), one half of the same list (number 15 per annum), one half of the same list (number 16 per annum), one half of the same list (number 16 per annum), one half of this list (number 14 per annum), one half of the same list (number 16 per annum), one half of the same list (number 16 per annum).

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is above.