Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2014, at around 06:20 on March 17, 2014, the Defendant driving a rocketing taxi, and driving three lanes prior to the Mandong in Seongbuk-ro Seoul, Hancheon-ro, Seongbuk-ro, 693, at a speed of about 10km from the long distance room to the long distance room.

Since there are many roads that are passing through the vehicle, and there is an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed prior to entering the intersection and to check well the front side, and to prevent the accident by driving safely according to the traffic signal in advance.

However, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and neglected to discover and operate the EITI 100-wheeled Vehicle driven by the victim D(the age of 51) who was driven by the victim D(the age of 51) in violation of the stop signal from the left side of the vehicle driving direction due to the negligence of the Defendant's failure to stop the intersection signal, but the front part of the victim-wheeled Vehicle was shocked by the front part of the Defendant's vehicle.

The Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered from the injury to the right part of the above victim, who is in need of approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, to the right part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel in the accident site and vehicle-related photographor claim that, at the time of the instant case, the Defendant had stopped a vehicle at the location where the intersection stop line passes and that it did not go in violation of the stop signal.

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the victim stated in this court that the vehicle of the defendant was in progress, and stated in the investigative agency to the same effect, and ii) the photograph of the defendant's vehicle and the victim's vehicle taken over immediately after the case.